Sonar Mac

Sonar Mac

If the files to be analyzed are not in the directory where the analysis starts from, use the sonar.projectBaseDir property to move analysis to a different directory. E.G. analysis begins from jenkins/jobs/myjob/workspace but the files to be analyzed are in ftpdrop/cobol/project1. This is configured in sonar-project.properties as follows:

Property missing: `sonar.cs.analyzer.projectOutPaths'. No protobuf files will be loaded for this project.Scanner CLI is not able to analyze .NET projects. Please, use the SonarScanner for .NET. If you are running the SonarScanner for .NET, ensure that you are not hitting a known limitation.

The MAC-E project involves upgrades and technology insertion for the Navy's Multistatic Active Coherent Capability (MAC), a sonar subsystem that uses the SSQ-125 sonobuoy to generate loud sounds electronically rather than with small explosive charges.

While there are no threats, the sonar waves are green. The Full status in the top-right corner of the Sonar stands for the Full Protection state, using all CleanMyMac X's resources. Dots in the Sonar don't signify a threat; we're using them for the likelihood of a military device.

Property missing: sonar.cs.analyzer.projectOutPaths. No protobuf files will be loaded for this project. SonarScanner is not able to analyze .NET projects. Please use the Scanner for MSBuild.

While the SPARC VIS offers performance increases for signal processingkernels, AltiVec offers better performance due to its wider SIMD registersize. In addition to SIMD integer operations, AltiVec can execute up tofour 32-bit floating-point multiply and accumulate (MAC) operations perinstruction. For the 128-bit SIMD AltiVec register operations, using dataprefetching and permutation instructions are necessary to utilize the fullcapability of AltiVec. For example, transposing matrices in the 3-D sonarbeamformer is handled without computational overhead using permutationinstructions. I evaluate the performance of vertical and horizontalbeamforming kernels on the PowerPC and the UltraSPARC-II to compare theimpact of the compiler, SIMD word alignment, and cache block alignment onperformance.For computationally intensive applications such as the 3-D sonarbeamformer, scalability is a key aspect of the system. Thus, theComputational Process Network model is the design framework of thebeamforming system. This programming model decouples the computationprocesses (nodes) from the communication processes (queues). In a 3-Dbeamforming system, the nodes consist of the sonar sensors, the verticalbeamforming kernels and the horizontal beamforming kernels. These nodescommunicate through the preallocated memory which work as FIFO queues. Onan UltraSPARC-II multiprocessor system, the CPN 3-D sonar beamformer showsnear-linear speedup up to 16 processors.I port the CPN 3-D sonar beamformer form the Sun to the Quad PowerPC G4SMP board using the new beamforming kernels and transposed queues. On thePowerPC board, I discover performance limitations due to the cachehierarchy. I evaluate the importance of interconnection in determiningscalable performance with the high-memory bandwidth application whichrequire relatively high memory bandwidth. This document is available in PDFformat.

The main contributions of our work are as follows: First, we propose the spike-based approximate backpropagation (SABP) algorithm for SNN training, whose approximate derivative of the spike neuronal activation function is simple and efficient. In addition, we have built general deep SNNs, which can adopt the popular architectures such as VGG [2] and ResNet [5] to build deep SNNs technologies and can also use SNN-based dropout to increase its generalization ability to alleviate the overfitting phenomenon in the learning process. We will then demonstrate the effectiveness of our work on MNIST, CIFAR-10, and sonar image target classification (SITC) datasets. To the best of our knowledge, the classification accuracy of our method is close to the best results on MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets and achieves the best classification accuracy on the SITC dataset. Finally, we further analyze the advantages of this method compared with ANN in terms of computational complexity and energy consumption. 781b155fdc

Back to Top